Posted in Book Reviews

5 Books I Won’t Buy Anytime Soon (Anti-Haul)

I was requested to do this a whilleee back by nourishedricipediary.wordpress.com but have yet to have done so. So uhhhhhhhh my bad. It’s here now though! As I was writing this though, I decided to split my list of 10 books to 5 and just include the other 5 another time. Hope that’s okay!

A Court of Thorns and Roses and Other Hate Crimes by Sarah J. Maas

Sarah J Maas has been in hot water as of late, mainly because of the lack of diversity in her books and overall not responding well to critiques and discussing race. One of her most popular series, “A Court of Thorns and Roses,” is very smut heavy, which I’m not into anyway, but seems to be very popular, so it’s a shame that she’s actively choosing to not include all her readers. I don’t have much of an opinion on the series anyway, seeing as I’m super into elves but not romance (unless it’s a side plot) much less smut. I am concerned though that a bunch of the readers seem to be young teens considering the content within the series. There’s a huge difference between a 13 year old and a 16 year old in terms of what content they should be exposed to at that age and seeing as the maturity levels are completely different, i don’t know if it’s wise to let a 13 year old be exposed to not only sexual content but straight up abuse. 

Anything by JK Rowling (especially her script writing and screenplays)

I’m a long time Harry Potter fan, I’m not going to deny it. I even watched the movies in different languages because I watched them in English too many times. Like Daniel Radcliffe said, ““Being in Harry Potter is like being in the Mafia. Once you are in, you are never really out.” And I’m not going to deny that JKR’s creation has created me so much joy. But I think now that JKR’s terfy comments have lost her a huge amount of credibility as an author, I’d like to admit something: I only read the series once. I finished the series before I started middle school and ended it there. I watched the films hundreds of times, read thousands of fanfics, liked thousands of pieces of fanart, but only read the series once. If Harry Potter was still largely loved today in the book community, I still would’ve probably would have only read it once and a ton of people online would tell me that I wasn’t a “true fan,” or something like that and I would stand by it. Why? Because my mind of what the best part of what Harry Potter is, was largely created by fellow fans. If JK told me right now that Sirius Black, Remus Lupin, and Tonks are 100% straight I wouldn’t take it seriously. Same goes with justifying whatever is going on with Cho Chang’s name and that the goblins at the wizard bank Gringotts aren’t a racist caricature of jews. I mean everything that was wrong with HP was largely fixed by fanfiction authors who were writing it for free. I’ve read better fanfiction than whatever was going on in The Cursed Child. 

Now if you still believe that JK isn’t a TERF (trans exclusionary radical feminist) then you’re taking a little too long on the denial stage of the grieving process. There’s no way her tweets and anti-trans manifesto can be interpreted as “badly worded,” or “an old person moment,” at this point. She’s written several, “opinion,” pieces (which I’m putting in quotations because I can’t consider her hate speech just an opinion anymore.) I was going to actually pick it apart and even I, a cis woman, had to stop. Especially at the part where she tries to correlate autistic people and gender dysphoria as if disabled people aren’t smart enough to know their gender identity. 

Twilight Which Could’ve Ended in One Book if Bella Swan Just Went To Therapy by Stephenie Meyer

Now before the Twilight fans come for me, I want to point out that I did give the series a good honest try. Even as a tween, I never could get into books that’s main focus is romance rather than a subplot. I barely finished the second book and around the part where Bella is riding a motorcycle I stopped. I’m not going to lie though, whoever was in charge of the movie’s soundtrack did an amazing job and the movies are definitely fun to watch as long as you don’t take it too seriously. (I definitely recommend watching it as a comedy rather than a serious film.) I never finished the last film though so I don’t actually know how everything ends. However, the director of the Twilight films, Catherine Hardwicke, recently said in an interview that she wanted to make the cast more diverse and debated it often with Stephenie Meyer who felt it was not realistic. Unfortunately, it didn’t help that the one black vampire was also the villain and that she also used the Quileute tribe very often. 

The Selection aka The Bachelor Knockoff I Legit Did Not Ask For by Kiera Cass

First off the main character’s name is America Singer. I’m sorry but I can’t stop laughing at that name. I can’t also get over that it seems like an off brand Bachelor with some similarities to Hunger Games for spice and not for the main point of Hunger Games which is to call out capitalism and the upper class. If you’ve gotten this far into the post, you’ve probably figured out that I’m really not into romance as a genre. This is due to the fact that I do not care. If it’s a side plot I’ll allow it, but overall I don’t care about romance so why would I buy a book and read about it? 

Stormdancer makes anime fans look bad by Jay Kristoff

Jay Kristoff has recently been called out for his Lotus War series for relying heavily on Japanese stereotypes and not actually doing heavy research for this series. He also was called about for antisemitism, more specifically blood libel, which to be honest, as a non-Jew, I did not know about. It’s pretty much an anti-semetic lie that Jewish people used non-Jewish people’s blood for ritual purposes, which is not only heavily against the Torah but also against the kashrut, or Jewish dietary laws. If you would like more info on blood libel and Jay Kristoff, here’s a link to Katherine Locke’s post on it and info on blood libel from the Holocaust Memorial Museum:

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/blood-libel?fbclid=IwAR3XW8dw2ZllFWMrrajrMBd4AHCpG8DV1OvmvTAro14wK1kaeK1eQC9s4G0

Not only is it sad that an author did very minimal research into his Japanese inspired fantasy novel, the antisemitism references are just pure terrifying. If I’m going to read a book I want it to be very thought out, researched and not make me research Nazi propaganda. I don’t think that’s a lot to ask.

If you would like to see more of books I will NOT be hauling anytime soon, I plan on releasing more posts soon! And of course if there’s any on YOUR list, feel free to share! I’d also like to say that if you have any post ideas please let me know and I can see what I can do! Hope you all have a good week! 🙂

-rachel h

Posted in Uncategorized

The Gray Area in Corporate Entertainment

When we read, watch a film, or binge a good TV show, we entertain ourselves with new and exciting plots, stories, and maybe even gain some insight or a lesson or two along the way. But is it possible, that even with the nitty gritty, that Hollywood glamorizes these subjects? Granted, all Hollywood cares about is money, but where does the line cross from education to glamorization?

One key trope that comes to mind is the Manic Pixie Dream Girl. The term, created by film critic Nathan Rabin defines it as a female character who, “exists solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures.” Now what does this dream girl have to do with glamorization? Almost always, especially in film, this girl always has some sort of quirky flaw like cancer or a mental illness then is proceeded to be used as an object in the plot to make the main character appreciate life more. One person who I saw fulfilling this trope was actually a male character, Augustus Waters from, “The Fault in Our Stars.” I saw it in the theater at around 13 years old, and only saw the film because a friend at the time wanted to, not because I had any solid interest in the book or film. Throughout the film, Augustus has this sort of…I’m not sure how to explain. Let me just give examples of events that legitimately happened that still haunt me to this very day:

-Hazel, the main character, goes to a cancer support group and meets Augustus there. As she is waiting to be picked up after the meeting is over, she gets mad at Augustus because he gets a cigarette out, and she very clearly has breathing issues. Augustus then explained how him owning cigarettes and putting it on his mouth but not lighting it is some kind of, “metaphor.” Yes. He’s completely serious about this and they then proceed to flirt with each other.

-One scene they just make out at the Anne Frank house and everyone claps. This scene still burns into my mind. I’m not going to lie, the film DID make me cry, it was a definite tear jerker film. I imagine the book being even MORE of a tear jerker. But who allowed this??? What in John Green’s mind, the publisher’s mind, the film company’s mind, in anyone’s mind thought this was not only a good idea to share with the world, but a climatic moment that should be shown in multiple mediums???

Those two scenes are the only one that really haunt me. Now let me be clear, I’m not hating on John Green, anyone who likes romance novels and films, or anything of the sort, however two strange phenomena occurred shortly after:

  1. Justin Bieber said that Anne Frank would’ve been a belieber
  2. A new medium of books and films romanticizing life threatening illnesses have been released.

Now of course, the Justin Bieber quote needs no explanation, but if you don’t believe fact number two may I suggest you look at “Five Feet Apart,” “All My Life,” and even “Me Before You.” But to be honest, I never saw the same sort of hype for those films as I have with TFIOS. And seeing the film, I don’t blame them for that. Even with a sad ending, it creates a world of hope, wonder, and love, even to those with terminal illnesses. But it’s very clear that the point isn’t to empathize and educate others on what it’s like to have cancer, but to create a love story. Even if it means they kiss at a historical landmark. Is that offensive? Or is it just a lighthearted story? 

Personally, I would hate my physical issues to be capitalized off of in such a manner, a lot of young adult books did that already with my mental ones, and glamorized mental illness and even psych wards. For example, “It’s Kind of a Funny Story.” I read it, and as a reader who was in a psych ward under militaristic type rules, it was hard for me to believe that not only did the average joe main character had sex with not one, but with two girls. He also happened to be grouped with adults as well even though he was only a teenager. I’m not saying sexual intercourse doesn’t happen in psych wards, but what I am saying is that my depression wasn’t cured because another patient fucked it out of me either. 

Another example are forms of entertainment based on actual events. Most people seem to have no issue with watching any film about, “The Titanic,” even if it’s a love story because the accident was so long ago. But what about other disasters? For example, wars like Vietnam, school shootings like what took place at Sandy Hook Elementary, or even COVID? What can Hollywood profit and not profit out of? Even though those types of films haven’t been a thing yet, will there be a time when it will be deemed acceptable and if so, when? 

What about all those countless stories about black people suffering? Such as films about, “12 Years a Slave,” which shows the brutality of slavery, or “The Hate U Give,” which is about police brutality? Of course both of these examples have good reviews and ratings, and have events that have legitimately happened and still do to this very day, but again, is it morally sound to profit off of the abuse of minorities? Especially if systematic racism normally puts white people at the tippy top of the corporate chain, and therefore they gain the most profit? If creators overuse certain ideas like they did with dystopian YA in the 2010’s, aren’t we doomed to see some not-so-innovative (and even offensive) content?

These questions have been popping up a multitude of times, especially on Twitter. If I remember correctly, there was a debate not too long ago about the book, “All the Light We Cannot See,” about a german boy who is a member of the german army and a blind french girl falling in love as the Nazis slowly try to take over France. But with book discussions, they all happen so fast online, that even if it was less than a week ago, it feels like old news. I also recall seeing a few discussions about minorities and what they were looking for in regards to representation in books and shows and even the book, “White Fragility,” was in some hot water. 

What I’m not trying to say is that we shouldn’t be allowed to have the content that I’ve listed. What I am saying though, is that because this medium is being shown through capitalistic companies, the line between education and glamorization, or the purpose of the pieces we have seen, can get blurry at times. Some topics that people have debated about are still being debated about to this very day. And the line between ethical and unethical only gets grayer and grayer.

If you would like to share some of your thoughts on this topic, feel free to comment! 🙂